Wednesday, February 18, 2009

What you don't see

Here's the scenario, the offense catches the pull and immediately advances the disc up the break side.  The defense arrives.  The handlers execute a perfect dump-swing to the force side.  As the disc is swung, the receiver at the front of the stack takes a hard two steps forward toward the break side and then turns and cuts deep along the break side of the stack.  The force side handler catches the swing and makes a beautiful forehand huck to the endzone where the deep cutting receiver catches it for a score.  Everybody celebrates and talks about the great throw and the great cut.

Strangely, nobody celebrates the action that actually caused the score.  Not only is this action not celebrated, it isn't even noticed by most players in the game or on the sidelines.  Truthfully, the player who took the action may not even realize the opportunity he created.  If asked, he might respond that he was just making the cut that "felt right" at the time.

The key man involved in this scoring play and involved in most scoring plays is the man who vacates the position where the disc ends up being caught.  In the scenario above, the last man in the stack was the key to the score.  As the disc was being swung, the last man in the stack took 2 hard steps deep and then cut back in toward the force side handler.  The defender assigned to the last man in the stack never saw the actual deep cutter because he was too worried about his man catching the disc underneath.  By actively clearing the deep space, the last man in the stack created a scoring opportunity without touching the disc.

I'd like you to re-imagine the above scenario, but this time let's make the last man in the stack a more typically unaware receiver.  The offense catches the pull and immediately advances the disc up the break side.  The defense arrives.  The handlers execute a perfect dump-swing to the force side.  As the disc is swung, the receiver at the front of the stack takes a hard two steps forward toward the break side and then turns and cuts deep along the break side of the stack. The force side handler catches the swing and makes a beautiful forehand huck to the endzone where the disc is knocked away by the well positioned "last back" defender.

The "last back" defender will be congratulated by his teammates for superior vision and anticipation.  And, in a way, he deserves this praise.  He was aware enough to recognize an offensive opportunity and thwart it.  He was not, however, forced to make a choice.  The receiver he was marking (Mr. Typically Unaware, last in the stack) did nothing to keep his attention. Because his receiver was no threat, the "last back" defender was free to survey the field and anticipate the offense's movement at his leisure.

The effects of active clearing are not only felt on deep throws.  Any area of the field is susceptible to clogging due to improper clearing.  We have all been told that "you have cut away as hard as you cut in", but few of us have considered why.  A cursory look at any struggling offense will show you a group of receivers who do not create space for one another through active clearing.

8 comments:

  1. I think this is the fundamental difference between a team that flows and one that doesn't. In basketball it is called "moving without the ball". It is the best advantage an offense can have against a defense. They don't even have to be as athletic, if they're moving the defense where they want to. This is why the old-guard mocks the BDA recruits to ultimate.

    On to the other side, the "sandwich" goes a long way to thwarting this set play (this type of set play also caused the development of the zone and 'junk' defenses). So how would one go about beating the sandwich against a vert stack.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BDAs (big dumb athletes) should, however, have some field sense if they came from other sports. Ultimate is not unique in its ideas about filling and vacating space (flow). The old-guard mocks the BDA recruits mostly out of fear that the game they love may get raised to a level that they cannot reach, in my opinion.

    This is not a set play, however. This is a receiver seeing space that needs to be filled and filling that space. I'm sure that a junk/zone can stop the huck described in this scenario from happening. The trouble is that the receiver who cut from the back of the stack will now be open for a 15 yard gain on the force side.

    Now, you might say that one of the front stack defenders will poach this cutting lane, eliminating the easy 15 yard gain. But then, that defender's receiver will be open.

    All of this is a long way of saying that a vert stack beats a sandwich by:
    a. winning individual matchups
    b. moving the disc more quickly and not allowing the defense to find its best angles.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've thought that a good sandwich can take a vert stack, just because there are enough people in the same space - makes it much easier for one defender to cover two people (especially if those two people are still in the stack).

    Which is one reason I like the ho-stack, but I've been unable to find a group that will/can run it effectively to get experience with it. It seems much harder to effectively sandwich it since it is much more spread out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like ho-stack as well, provided that you have 4 receivers who can beat their defenders. The thing is: most players aren't anywhere near as good as they think they are. And, when running a ho-stack, if your middle receivers aren't getting it done, your offense is cooked.

    It would be fun to practice a ho-stack for 10 hours (not all at once of course) just to see the ins and outs of it. I too have had limited (read: bad) experience with a ho-stack, but I think that had more to do with the team than the strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think the major fault of the ho-stack is that the extremely simple version to teach and learn is extremely simple to defend. The only chance you have is to out run the defender. So that does in fact rely on the middle receivers.

    The 'normal' ho-stack, from what I've seen in theory has three active receivers that can really get the disc (unless you're trapped in the line).. and the upside is that the flow can fundamentally change (i.e. not the clockwise flow of the vert). The 'hard part' is the spacing, and the receivers having played with each other.

    10 hours would be great.

    ReplyDelete
  6. To beat a sandwich with H or V stack:
    Assume for two offensive players there's one D under and one deep. Both O cut in. Under D will be forced to commit to one of the two O. Throw to other O.

    Other option, if the sandwich is wide enough is to play into the middle, but that requires more skilled throws.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree gspong, "flooding" the sandwich is the way to go. But with a vert, I think it is harder... b/c there is one more guy in the stack that can help out on D. That makes for 4 or 5 people in the lane as opposed to 3, still with a guy over top.

    In the ho-stack, the only guy close enough to help is the guy covering a dump (and sometimes he is already on the break side, not as useful). And that leaves you open to a lot of nasty things.

    ReplyDelete
  8. With the vert against the sandwich, the handlers need to break the mark to get the disc over to the break side. The sandwich does a great job of taking away the force side throwing lanes like a zone. But, it is essentially over-committed to the force side. If the handler can break, the sandwich will be woefully out of position for several throws.

    ReplyDelete